RESUMEN
AIM: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) severely impairs patient prognosis and quality of life (QOL). Although lipoprotein apheresis (LA) has been applied to patients with PAD and elevated serum atherogenic lipoproteins, we hypothesized that LA can be effective for treating PAD even in patients with controlled serum lipoproteins through pleiotropic anti-atherosclerotic effects beyond lipoprotein removal. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LA in patients with treatment-resistant PAD and controlled serum lipoproteins focusing on QOL. METHODS: In a single-arm prospective study, 30 patients with refractory PAD who had controlled serum lipoproteins underwent sequential LA sessions using dextran sulfate adsorption columns, aiming to complete 10 sessions. The ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) and vascular QOL (VascuQOL) score were evaluated as the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and biological antioxidant potential (BAP) as an endothelial function test and serum antioxidative-capacity evaluation, respectively. RESULTS: ABI significantly increased after LA sessions (pre-treatment 0.60±0.09 vs. post-treatment 0.65±0.13, p=0.023). Total VascuQOL score (3.7±1.1 vs 4.6±1.1, pï¼0.001) and RHI (1.70±0.74 vs 2.34±1.76, p=0.023) significantly improved after the LA sessions. BAP tended to increase after the LA sessions, and the change reached statistical significance 3 months after treatment. CONCLUSION: ABI and QOL improved after a series of LA sessions in conventional treatment-resistant PAD patients with controlled serum lipoprotein levels. Increased antioxidative capacity and ameliorated endothelial function were observed after the LA treatment.
RESUMEN
A 74-year-old Japanese male with lung squamous cell carcinoma received his first dose of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): ipilimumab and nivolumab. He developed acute kidney injury (AKI) and was admitted to our department. We diagnosed kidney immune-related adverse effects (irAE), and a kidney biopsy revealed acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. We started oral prednisolone (PSL) and his AKI immediately improved. The patient maintained stable findings after PSL was tapered off. However, seven months after the ICI administration, he developed rapid progressive glomerular nephritis and was admitted to our department again. The second kidney biopsy showed findings consistent with anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis. Although the patient was treated with pulse methylprednisolone followed by oral PSL and plasma exchange, he became dependent on maintenance hemodialysis. To our knowledge, no case report has described two different types of biopsy-proven nephritis. In cases of suspected relapsing kidney irAEs, both a relapse of previous nephritis and the development of another type of nephritis should be considered.
